automoderated, emailconfirmed
60,768
edits
m (Kylebass moved page Sandbox/Kawasaki ZZR250 to Kawasaki EX250H) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|successor = | |successor = | ||
|class = [[Sport touring]] | |class = [[Sport touring]] | ||
|engine = | |engine = Four stroke . parallel twin, DOHC , 4 [[valve]] per cylinder | ||
|bore_stroke = | |bore_stroke = | ||
|compression = | |compression = 12.4:1 | ||
|top_speed = | |top_speed = 152.7 km/h / 94.9 mph | ||
|power = | |||
|torque = | |||
|power = | |||
|torque = | |||
|fuel_system = | |fuel_system = | ||
|ignition = Electronic advance | |||
|ignition = | |spark_plug = {{sparkplug|NGK CR8HSA}}, {{sparkplug|NGK CR8HIX}}, {{sparkplug|NGK CR8HVX}} option {{sparkplug|NGK CR7HSA}}, {{sparkplug|CR7HIX}} | ||
|spark_plug = | |||
|battery = | |battery = | ||
|transmission = | |transmission = 6 Speed | ||
|frame = Tubular diamond design | |||
|suspension =Front: Telescopic forks <br> | |||
Rear: UNI-TRAK single shock | |||
|frame = | |brakes =Front: Single 260mm disc <br>Rear: Single 230mm disc | ||
|suspension = | |front_tire = {{tire|100/80-16}} | ||
|brakes = | |rear_tire = {{tire|130/80-16}} | ||
|front_tire = | |rake_trail = | ||
|rear_tire | |wheelbase = 1400 mm / 55.1 in | ||
| | |length = | ||
|width = | |||
|rake_trail = | |height = | ||
|wheelbase = | |seat_height = 740 mm / 29.3 in | ||
|length = | |dry_weight = 138 kg / 304 lbs | ||
|width = | |wet_weight = 160 kg / 355 lbs | ||
|height | |fuel_capacity = 18 Liters / 4.7 US gal | ||
|oil_capacity = | |||
|seat_height = | |fuel_consumption = | ||
|dry_weight = | |turning_radius = | ||
|wet_weight = | |related = | ||
|fuel_capacity = | |||
|oil_capacity = | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|competition = | |competition = | ||
| | |oil_filter ={{oilfilter|K&N KN-401}}<ref name="kl_2019">{{cite book|title=2019 K&L Supply Co Catalog|publisher=[https://www.klsupply.com/ K&L Supply Co]|date=2019}}</ref> | ||
| | |||
| | |||
|manuals = [[:File:Kawasaki EX250H ZZR250 90-96 Service Manual.pdf]] | |manuals = [[:File:Kawasaki EX250H ZZR250 90-96 Service Manual.pdf]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Kawasaki EX250H''' was motorcycle produced by [[Kawasaki]] and known in many markets as the '''Kawasaki ZZR250'''. It could reach a top speed of 152.7 km/h / 94.9 mph. | |||
==Engine== | |||
The engine was a Liquid cooled cooled Four stroke . parallel twin, DOHC , 4 valve per cylinder. The engine featured a 12.4:1 [[compression ratio]]. | |||
==Drive== | |||
Power was moderated via the Wet, multi-disc, manual, cable-actuated. | |||
==Chassis== | |||
It came with a 100/80-16 front [[tire]] and a 130/80-16 rear tire. Stopping was achieved via Single 260mm disc in the front and a Single 230mm disc in the rear. The front suspension was a Telescopic forks while the rear was equipped with a UNI-TRAK single shock. The ZZR250 was fitted with a 18 Liters / 4.7 US gal fuel tank. The bike weighed just 138 kg / 304 lbs. The wheelbase was 1400 mm / 55.1 in long. | |||
== Photos == | |||
[[File:Kawasaki-GPX250R-87--1.jpg|600px|Kawasaki ZZR250]] | |||
[[File:Kawasaki-GPX250R-88.jpg|600px|Kawasaki ZZR250]] | |||
[[File:Kawasaki-GPX250R-87.jpg|600px|Kawasaki ZZR250]] | |||
== Overview == | |||
The Kawasaki Ninja 250R (codenamed EX250; previous generations | |||
had market-specific names) is a motorcycle in the Ninja sport bike series | |||
from the Japanese manufacturer Kawasaki originally introduced is 1986. As | |||
the marque's entry-level sport bike,[1][2] the motorcycle has undergone few | |||
changes throughout its quarter-century lifetime, having received only three | |||
substantial redesigns. In some markets the Ninja 250 has been succeeded by | |||
the Ninja 300. | |||
Since 2008, the bike is marketed as the Ninja 250R in all | |||
markets. It is also referred to by its platform designation, EX250, to which a | |||
generational suffix is attached. In the United States, previous models | |||
(EX250-E/F/G/H) were already being marketed as members of the Ninja family of | |||
, while outside of the U.S. the bike was known variously as the | |||
ZZR-250, ZX-250, or as the GPX-250R. One of the earliest models, the EX250-C, | |||
was given the name GPZ-250. | |||
It was 1959 when the Japanese | |||
first built a four-stroke 250 that revved to 14,000rpm and produced 35hp - it | |||
was a four cylinder Honda racer. Twenty-nine years later Kawasaki have | |||
produced a four-stroke 250 that revs to 14,000rpm and produces 37hp - it's a | |||
twin-cylinder road bike. Plus ca change, plus la meme chose. | |||
Ever since the 125cc, 12hp learner regulations were introduced into this | |||
country | |||
the 250cc class has been languishing in the doldrums, only being kept alive by | |||
a handful of trail bikes, commuter machines and a very competitive production | |||
racing class. It seemed that people progressing from a learner bike wanted | |||
something a little bigger and more exciting than a pedestrian 250 -the 350LC | |||
sold in its thousands. Not even the desirable RG250 Gamma could tempt the | |||
British back to 250s. | |||
In Japan, meanwhile, the 250 class | |||
was at the leading edge of technological progress. Because there is a stepped | |||
licensing system there, of which the 250 class is the first rung on the | |||
ladder, the Japanese manufacturers have invested milions of Yen on research | |||
and development in this all-important class. Sales of 250s in Japan are | |||
astronomical and Tokyo is knee-deep in quarter-litre bikes of all shapes and | |||
sizes. Purpose-built delivery bikes jostle with state-of-the-art two-stroke | |||
race replicas, and in a market where the top-selling 250s sell at a rate of 40 | |||
a day it's small wonder that the Japanese consider this class to be so vital. | |||
Despite the stunning performance of modern two-stroke 250s there's still a | |||
resistance in this country to buying something that not all that long ago | |||
would've been a learner bike. It seems that in this country cubic capacity is | |||
more important than anything else - never mind that something like aTZR250 | |||
will give any 750 a good run for its money (you only have to watch the antics | |||
of the 250 proddie boys at the Isle of Man to see that). Even so, some of the | |||
importers in this country have taken their courage in both hands and begun to | |||
import some of Japan's hot 250s. | |||
Suzuki started it with the 250 | |||
Gamma, but it was a long time before Yamaha replied with their TZR. Having | |||
achieved moderate success with it Yamaha took then the brave step of bringing | |||
in the TDR250 while at the same time Kawasaki announced the introduction of | |||
the GPX250, an update of the highly acclaimed GPZ250 that wowed them all in | |||
Japan and the States. Suddenly Britain is reawakening to the fact that 250s | |||
can be fun as well as relatively cheap to buy and run, and now the only | |||
Japanese manufacturer not to have a sports 250 in its range is Honda. | |||
Kawasaki's offering is the only one, however, not to feature the very latest | |||
in two-stroke technology, mainly because it's a four-stroke... or is it? Well | |||
obviously it is a four-stroke because it has double overhead cams and four | |||
valves per cylinder, but it's totally unlike any other four-stroke I've ridden | |||
because it behaves in many respects like a two-stroke. | |||
The GPX250's twin-cylinder motor | |||
is not so much an all new creation as a much modified GPZ250 engine, sporting | |||
many features common to its bigger GPX brothers. The 62mm bore and very short | |||
41.2mm stroke displace 248cc, with a compression ratio of 12.4:1. The double | |||
overhead cams are chain-driven and actuate four minuscule valves per cylinder | |||
by what is now very much standard Kawasaki valve gear. Each valve is moved by | |||
an individual cam lobe and rocker arm follower, with the lash adjustment via a | |||
screw and locknut on the pivot end of the rocker arm like the GPX750. Although | |||
common to all GPX Kawasaki's, this type of valve gear was first used in the | |||
GPZ250 and greatly improves intake efficiency over their old valve gear set | |||
ups. | |||
In order to iron out some of the inherent vibes put out by a parallel twin, | |||
Kawasaki have fitted the GPX with a gear-driven balancer that does a good job | |||
of keeping vibration to a minimum. | |||
The engine breathes through a pair | |||
of 30mm Keihin CV carbs which are fed from the large airbox via Kawasaki's | |||
'special patented' rubber ducts, and the whole plot is water-cooled by a | |||
similar, but smaller system to that used on the bigger GPX's. Drive to the | |||
rear wheel is by chain rather than the belt fitted to some 250 Kawas. The | |||
effect of all this high-techery is a four-stroke 250 twin that makes a claimed | |||
37hp at 11,000 and 1 Sftlb of torque at 10.000rpm. That's the equivalent of | |||
148hp-per-litre. | |||
The figures really speak for | |||
themselves -this is one peaky motorcycle. From the moment you start it up you | |||
realise that it is very different from anything you've ridden before - only | |||
the naff choke action (either 'on' at 4000rpm, or 'off' and no go) is there to | |||
remind you that this is a Kawasaki. The GPX also takes a long time to warm up | |||
and can't easily be ridden around the minute you start it up first thing in | |||
the morning. Once under way the engine feels totally unremarkable at the lower | |||
end of its rev range. Pottering around town below 6000rpm the GPX feels much | |||
like any other four-stroke 250 - pretty sedate and pedestrian. It's only when | |||
you ride it in the manner for which it was designed that it begins to show its | |||
mettle, pulling with increasing urgency from 6000 revs all the way up to the | |||
14,000rpm redline. | |||
Because it's so gutless at low | |||
revs the GPX has a definite two-stroke feel about the way it puts out power. | |||
It doesn't have a vicious power band like most two-strokes, but it does build | |||
power very quickly from seven grand, and that's where the GPX feels | |||
happiest. Just as on a two-stroke, the little Kawasaki needs to be ridden hard | |||
and fast, making frequent use of the slick six-speed gearbox and surprisingly | |||
(for a Kawasaki) progressive clutch. Considering the rewy nature of the beast, | |||
fuel consumption is a reasonable 54mpg. Keep it in the power and the GPX will | |||
go with surprising rapidity, revving cleanly up to the redline in the first | |||
five gears. | |||
Top gear, however, seems to be | |||
something of an overdrive gear because the Kawasaki won't rev beyond 12,000rpm | |||
in top (a thousand revs beyond the point that peak horsepower is produced), | |||
which gives it a rather disappointing top speed of an indicated 10Omph - a | |||
real life 97mph that isn't much faster than a VT250. | |||
If the engine's performance is not | |||
as exciting as one would have hoped, the suspension, chassis and brakes make | |||
up for it. Surprisingly, there is no suspension adjustment avaiable either | |||
front or back but the GPX seems none the worse for it. Front forks are 36mm | |||
items, while at the back nestles the familiar Uni-Trak monoshock that for the | |||
first time is not even adj ustable for preload. Despite the apparently | |||
low-tech nature of the set-up, handling is uncompromised. With a meaty | |||
diamond-type frame (similar in design to that used on the GPZ900) keeping | |||
everything flex-free, the GPX handles very well. Because the bike is so light | |||
and narrow it feels very much like the GPZ500S in its handling | |||
characteristics. The springing in the forks and rear shock is fine for someone | |||
of my 1751b, butis too soft for anyone much heavier or for serious two-up | |||
work. The damping, however, is spot-on and the lack of adjustability isn't | |||
missed until you really start working the suspension hard. | |||
Pushing the GPX to its limits is a thoroughly enjoyable experience, mainly | |||
because they're not too easily reached. On winding back roads the Kawasaki is | |||
in its | |||
element, sixteen inch wheels front | |||
and back make It very quick steering, and this f lickability Is further | |||
Increased by the racy 27° of rake and a mere 83mm of trail. The GPX250 | |||
actually puts more rubber on the road than the GPZ500 and feels very | |||
sure-footed as a result. Hustling the Kawasaki through the twisties produces | |||
very few dramas, and the only time the handling becomes upset is after giving | |||
it prolonged welly, when the damping at the back end begins to fade. | |||
Fortunately the 250 lacks the ground-clearance problems of the GPZ500, so the | |||
first things to touch down are the rubber hero-bumps on the footrests rather | |||
than part of the fairing. | |||
Another piece of trickery | |||
inherited from other GPXs is the excellent brake system. Although it only has | |||
a single disc front and rear, the set-up is so good that the GPX feels | |||
somewhat overbraked. Kawasaki's dual-piston Balanced Actuation Caliper has | |||
been fitted to the front disc with the result that the GPX will almost | |||
literally stop on a sixpence. The rear brake is just a standard item, but the | |||
power and feel of the brakes is truly remarkable and the bike can be brought | |||
to a halt with amazing speed and safety. | |||
Styling is always very subjective, | |||
but I don't think there are many people who'd argue that the GPX250 is | |||
anything other than very pretty. Unlike the GPX750 and 600, the 250 has such | |||
smooth, flowing lines and looks very tasty in its black and red livery (the | |||
only color scheme available). The way the fairing, seat and tail unit blend | |||
together much better than on other G PXs, but the fairing is also much less | |||
effective than on the 600 and 750. The 250's screen is so low as to make | |||
crouching down behind it all but impossible, and in trying to make the GPX as | |||
slim as possible, Kawasaki have made the fairing so narrow that it affords | |||
virtually no weather protection at all. Your hands, arms, upper body and feet | |||
are all stuck out in the breeze ready to get nice and wet at the first sign of | |||
rain. | |||
Fortunately, the GPX makes up in | |||
other ways. The instrumentation is clear and easy to read, switchgear is much | |||
improved now that Kawasaki have finally started fitting push-in-to-cancel | |||
indicator switches, and the seat is more comfortable than that of bigger GPXs. | |||
The riding position is on the sporty side without being too radical or placing | |||
too much weight on your wrists, and Kawasaki have even gone as far as fitting | |||
the GPX with all sorts of luxuries we all thought had died out - you know, | |||
things like pillion grabrails, centrestands, and petrol tanks that take more | |||
than three gallons of fuel. The GPX even has practical touches like | |||
retractable bungee hooks and a fairing that can be removed in something | |||
approaching a trice. What a pity the Japanese still haven't got round to | |||
putting decent, loud horns on their motorcycles. | |||
After two weeks with the GPX2501 | |||
still don't quite know what to make of it. Kawasaki are touting it as a | |||
performance motorcycle, yet it doesn't quite have the performance it needs to | |||
succeed at the top end of the hot 250 class. It has all the disadvantages of a | |||
two-stroke - a peaky and frenetic engine that needs to be worked hard -without | |||
any of a two-stroke's advantages - power and speed. Compared to a TZR250 or | |||
RG250 the GPX is heavier by 221b, slower by 15mph, down on power bv around | |||
10hp and produces 30 percent less torque. | |||
All of which would be well and | |||
good if the GPX was significantly cheaper than the TZR or the Gamma, but it | |||
isn't. At £2499 the GPX is only £60 cheaper than a Gamma, only £100 cheaper | |||
than a TDR250, only £250 less than a TZR and the same price as an RD350LC. | |||
Even if you wouldn't be seen dead on a two-stroke there are four-strokes that | |||
offer much more for almost the same | |||
money - the VT500, GT550 and most of the big singles. Kawasaki's own GPZ500S | |||
is only £150 more. The GPX250 is an interesting and capable 'entry-level' bike | |||
because of its low seat height and light weight, but it's too expensive by | |||
about £500. Then again, the sort of technology that's used in the GPX doesn't | |||
come cheap | |||
Source Motorcycle magazine 1988 | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" |