Difference between revisions of "Norton ES2"

23 bytes added ,  13:44, 6 September 2019
Line 38: Line 38:


==Development==
==Development==
[[File:Norton ES2 motorcycle 1949.JPG|thumb|left|upright=0.8|1949 ES2]]
 
It was a long stroke single, always 79mm x 100mm bore and stroke, originally launched as a [[Sport bike|sports motorcycle]] but throughout its long life it was gradually overtaken by more powerful models.   
It was a long stroke single, always 79mm x 100mm bore and stroke, originally launched as a [[Sport bike|sports motorcycle]] but throughout its long life it was gradually overtaken by more powerful models.   


Line 53: Line 53:
File:1946-norton-es2-500cc-single-7.jpg|1946 Norton ES2  500cc single
File:1946-norton-es2-500cc-single-7.jpg|1946 Norton ES2  500cc single
</gallery>
</gallery>
==1949==
[[File:Norton ES2 motorcycle 1949.JPG|thumb|left|upright=0.8|1949 ES2]]
{{clear}}
==Featherbed frame==
==Featherbed frame==
From 1959 it used the Rex McCandless designed [[Featherbed frame]], with upgrades featuring an improved AMC gearbox, revised cylinder head, crankshaft-mounted Lucas RM15 60-watt alternator with coil ignition and an 8-inch front brake with full width hubs front and rear.<ref name= "The Motor Cycle">The Motor Cycle, Road Test, 4 June 1959</ref> The wideline Featherbed-framed bike was road tested in ''[[The Motor Cycle]]'' 4 June 1959 issue and was reported to have a mean top speed of 82&nbsp;mph with petrol consumption of 56 mpg at 60&nbsp;mph.<ref name= "The Motor Cycle"/>
From 1959 it used the Rex McCandless designed [[Featherbed frame]], with upgrades featuring an improved AMC gearbox, revised cylinder head, crankshaft-mounted Lucas RM15 60-watt alternator with coil ignition and an 8-inch front brake with full width hubs front and rear.<ref name= "The Motor Cycle">The Motor Cycle, Road Test, 4 June 1959</ref> The wideline Featherbed-framed bike was road tested in ''[[The Motor Cycle]]'' 4 June 1959 issue and was reported to have a mean top speed of 82&nbsp;mph with petrol consumption of 56 mpg at 60&nbsp;mph.<ref name= "The Motor Cycle"/>
automoderated, emailconfirmed
17,285

edits