Difference between revisions of "Norton F"
(upgrading template) |
(template fixes) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Motorcycle | {{Motorcycle | ||
|name = | |name = Norton F | ||
|photo=Norton-FEATHERBED-2.jpg | |photo=Norton-FEATHERBED-2.jpg | ||
|aka = | |aka = |
Latest revision as of 22:22, 23 November 2019
Norton F | |
Manufacturer | |
---|---|
Weight | |
Manuals | Service Manual |
Photos[edit | edit source]
Overview[edit | edit source]
Norton 500
Norton 500 1949
1949 NORTON 500. Although Nortons achieved so many I-1
successes in the Senior T.T. series in the 1930-49 period, this was mainly
because they pressed ahead with development of their race machinery on
established lines. Each year they were a little better and went a little
quicker. They lost the 1935 race by 4 sec. to the big Guzzi
They were trounced by the B.M.W. in 1939but had not touched
the 1938 machines due to pressure of work for the Government. In all other years
they won.
Changes were made steadily to the machine; the gearbox was altered to a
four-speeder, plunger rear springing came in 1936 to be followed in 1938 by the
first Norton telescopic forksthe first British factory to use them in the
modern style. Brakes got bigger and better, and conical light-alloy hubs were
used on both wheels, along with alloy rims.
In 1930 the engine had iron head and barrel and a horizontal
inlet tract. Downdraught appeared in 1931, alloy barrels and heads in the middle
thirties and the first double o.h.c. soon followed.
All these features were used on the 1949 machine, with alloy tanks, hydraulic
damping on the rear suspension, and everything was set to win the T.T. Win it
did. Harold Daniell, the man whose 1938 lap record of 91 m.p.h. was still
standing (for that was set on the petrol-benzole, whereas in '49 the fuel was
"Pool"), set a cracking pace from the start and won handsomely at 8693 m.p.h.,
only 2i m.p.h. short of the petrol-benzole record average.
Although the Norton had won, its handling at the very high
speeds of which it was capable left a lot to be desired. It was a machine that
had to be ridden in rather the same fashion as a high-speed scrambler, with
sturdy muscles more or less a prerequisite for success.
Over in Ulster a couple of brothers thought they could improve this. . . .
Although almost twenty years separated the model shown on the
preceding page this 1949 job, the lines of the two machines are surprisingly
similar. Keen eyes will that this model has the experimental forks with the
large hollow wheel spindle cai in front of the lower members, tried by the
factory in the 1949 T.T.
Specification
Engine: single-cylinder 500 c.c.
camshafts by shaft and bevels. Ignition: magneto.Transmission: chain via
four-speed gearbox.
Frame: cradle type with single down-tube and twin
lower rails; hydraulically damped plunger rear
suspension. Forks: "Roadholder" telescopies.
Norton "FEATHERBED" 1950
1950 "FEATHERBED" NORTON. Although Nortons had won the 1949 T.T., it had become increasingly obvious to the development team at the factory, headed by "Wizard of Waft" Joe Craig, that the results of more and more power being wrested from the highly tuned motor was that shortcomings were being revealed in the navigational departmentand this on the racing model from a factory whose products were advertised as "The World's Best Roadholder"! In Ireland the brothers Cromie and Rex McCandless had been experimenting, very successfully, with swinging-fork rear suspension Jim Ferriday had, through his Feridax organization, offered a service whereby private owners' machines were sprung by McCandlessand they had had a lot of racing success with a Special using a near-horizontal Triumph twin engine in a duplex frame. In the winter of 1949 they got together with the Norton factory and the result was seen early in 1950 when a team of factory racers appeared, looking vastly different from anything previously to leave the Bracebridge Street works Gone was the old "garden gate" type of plunger-frame, with bolt-through fuel tank and vast oil tank. In its place was a new-look racer with swinging-fork rear suspension and a full duplex cradle frame in which the main frame was made of two lengths of tube that swept down from the top of the steering-column tube to encircle the engine and gearbox and then rise vertically to the seat nose, where they curved forwards and returned to the base of the steering-column tube, which was thus cross-braced. Short lengths of tube were welded in between the loops to act as spacers and just astern of the gearbox a pivot was formed between gusset plates to carry a rear swinging-fork. A bolted-on sub-frame carried the seat and mudguard and anchored the tops of the rear hydraulically-damped spring units. [Continued opposite]. SPECIFICATION Engine: single-cylinder 500 c.c. d.o.h.c; drive to camshafts by shaft and bevel gear. Ignition: magneto. Transmission: chain via four-speed gearbox. Frame: full duplex cradle with two tubes forming continuous loop on each side of engine and gearbox and ends crossed to brace steering head; bolted on sub-frame for top anchorage for swinging-fork rear suspension units. Forks: "Roadholder" telescopies.