Difference between revisions of "Yamaha TZ250"

==TZ250G==

==TZ250G==

1980's "G" model was a further departure from the "norm" of the past 3 or 4 years. New, larger diameter forks were fitted in an effort to combat the front end "patter" problem that was frustrating so many riders. Motor-wise Yamaha went all-out for peak horsepower at the expense of engine lifespan by drastically increasing the inlet timing period by removing almost 8mm from the rear of the pistons (and slightly increasing bore size) . This mod caused real problems with piston wear, despite the factory's attempt to counteract it with the inclusion of a short supporting "tongue" protruding down from the top of the inlet port in a vain attempt to reduce piston rocking. TZ250 G's were, as a result, very expensive to maintain, requiring re-builds after every race, though no-one complained about the extra 4bhp it provided over the D/E/F models ! Yamaha also increased the width of the secondary transfers slightly this year as well as fitting powerjet carburettors.

1980's "G" model was a further departure from the "norm" of the past 3 or 4 years. New, larger diameter forks were fitted in an effort to combat the front end "patter" problem that was frustrating so many riders. Motor-wise Yamaha went all-out for peak horsepower at the expense of engine lifespan by drastically increasing the inlet timing period by removing almost 8mm from the rear of the pistons (and slightly increasing bore size) . This mod caused real problems with piston wear, despite the factory's attempt to counteract it with the inclusion of a short supporting "tongue" protruding down from the top of the inlet port in a vain attempt to reduce piston rocking. TZ250 G's were, as a result, very expensive to maintain, requiring re-builds after every race, though no-one complained about the extra 4bhp it provided over the D/E/F models ! Yamaha also increased the width of the secondary transfers slightly this year as well as fitting powerjet carburettors.