Difference between revisions of "Aprilia RST1000 Futura"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
5 bytes removed ,  17:52, 6 May 2019
Line 16: Line 16:


==Reception==
==Reception==
The bike's large, angular shape divided critics: some thought it was innovative and made it "look like an [[F-117]]" while others said it was just too bulky.    [[Motorcycle News|MCN]] reviewed the Futura, saying: "The Aprilia RST1000 Futura is desperately underestimated, sadly short lived and now a potential bargain. Aprilia’s ambitious rival for Honda’s polished VFR sports-tourer is able, well-specced and potent".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-reviews/aprilia/rst1000-futura/2001//|title=APRILIA RST1000 FUTURA  (2001-2003) Review|publisher=}}</ref>
The bike's large, angular shape divided critics: some thought it was innovative and made it "look like an F-117" while others said it was just too bulky.    [[Motorcycle News|MCN]] reviewed the Futura, saying: "The Aprilia RST1000 Futura is desperately underestimated, sadly short lived and now a potential bargain. Aprilia’s ambitious rival for Honda’s polished VFR sports-tourer is able, well-specced and potent".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-reviews/aprilia/rst1000-futura/2001//|title=APRILIA RST1000 FUTURA  (2001-2003) Review|publisher=}}</ref>
 


==Engine==
==Engine==
automoderated, emailconfirmed
60,768

edits

Navigation menu